![]()
Source: Fortune
Summary
The article discusses concerns about corporate America moving too slowly to adopt AI, despite growing awareness of its importance. Ryan McManus, a corporate director, argues that companies need to accelerate AI integration to avoid falling behind competitors. While some leaders are pushing for faster adoption, many lack the expertise or strategy to implement AI effectively. Only a small percentage of S&P 500 companies have board oversight of AI, and few have the right talent to guide its use. The piece highlights the risks of both moving too fast and too slow, using Ford’s AI missteps as an example. It concludes that AI deployment, not just development, is the real challenge for most businesses.
Our Reading
The numbers tell one story.
Corporate America is moving slowly on AI despite urgency.
Only 22% of S&P 500 companies have board oversight of AI.
Many companies lack the expertise to guide AI adoption.
Slowdowns in AI deployment risk falling behind competitors.
Author: Evan Null
The Case for Speed
Corporate America is under pressure to adopt AI quickly. The article highlights that 65% of public company directors consider AI the top issue on their agendas. This urgency is driven by the rapid evolution of AI and its potential to disrupt industries. Companies that delay AI integration risk being left behind by competitors who are already moving forward. The article suggests that the speed of AI adoption is a critical factor in maintaining a competitive edge.
The Talent Gap
A key challenge for corporate America is the limited talent pool capable of managing AI. The article points out that many companies are struggling to find and retain skilled professionals who can effectively implement AI strategies. This shortage is forcing companies to invest in upskilling and reskilling their existing workforce. However, the process is slow, and many organizations are still in the early stages of building the necessary expertise.
The Risks of Haste
While speed is important, the article also warns against moving too quickly without proper planning. Ford’s experience with AI in vehicle quality is cited as an example of the risks involved. The company’s initial attempt to replace human engineers with AI systems failed, leading to costly setbacks. This highlights the importance of balancing speed with careful implementation and human oversight.
The Crawl, Walk, Run Approach
The article outlines a phased approach to AI adoption, starting with the crawl phase, where companies focus on improving human productivity through AI. This is followed by the walk phase, where more complex use cases are developed and tested. The run phase involves scaling AI across the organization and unlocking new value. The article emphasizes that many companies are stuck in the crawl phase, while competitors are already planning their next steps.
The Role of Leadership
Leadership plays a crucial role in AI adoption. The article stresses that companies need a clear strategy, educated leadership, and structured policies to guide AI implementation. It also highlights the importance of recruiting and upskilling the workforce rather than cutting jobs. Without strong leadership and a well-defined plan, companies risk making costly mistakes and failing to realize the full potential of AI.








