Source: Chicago Tribune
Summary
Bally’s Corporation, a casino and resort operator, is facing a lawsuit in Illinois state court. The lawsuit alleges that the company’s use of facial recognition technology in its casinos violates state law. According to the complaint, Bally’s collected and stored patrons’ facial recognition data without obtaining adequate consent. The lawsuit seeks damages and injunctive relief.
Our Reading
The trend returns with a new name.
Illinois state law has specific requirements for the collection of biometric data. Bally’s Corporation is accused of violating these requirements. Facial recognition technology is not new, but its use in casinos raises concerns about patron privacy. The lawsuit highlights the ongoing tension between technology and consent. The cycle of data collection and regulation continues.
Author: Evan Null
Facial Recognition in Casinos
The use of facial recognition technology in casinos is not unique to Bally’s Corporation. Several casinos have implemented this technology in recent years, citing security concerns and the need to prevent cheating. However, the use of this technology raises concerns about patron privacy and the potential for misuse.
Illinois State Law
Illinois state law requires companies to obtain explicit consent before collecting and storing biometric data, including facial recognition data. The law also requires companies to provide clear notice to patrons about the collection and use of this data.
Bally’s Corporation
Bally’s Corporation operates several casinos and resorts in the United States. The company has not commented on the lawsuit, but it has stated that it takes patron privacy seriously.
The Lawsuit
The lawsuit was filed in Illinois state court and seeks damages and injunctive relief. The plaintiff alleges that Bally’s Corporation violated state law by collecting and storing facial recognition data without obtaining adequate consent.
Conclusion
The use of facial recognition technology in casinos raises important questions about patron privacy and the need for regulation. The lawsuit against Bally’s Corporation highlights the ongoing tension between technology and consent. As this technology becomes more widespread, it is likely that we will see more lawsuits and regulatory actions in the future.
