Source: Fortune
Summary
Corporate boards often make unanimous decisions, but research suggests that dissent occurs in only about 1% of board decisions. This unanimity can reveal as much about group dynamics as genuine agreement. The article draws parallels with avalanche safety training, where a single “no” can override the group’s decision. Corporate boards can learn from this approach to improve their decision-making process.
Our Reading
The numbers tell one story. Corporate boards’ unanimous decisions can be a warning sign of groupthink. The article highlights the importance of dissenting voices in boardrooms, citing Warren Buffett’s argument that the best boards are those where directors challenge assumptions. To improve decision-making, boards can experiment with structured disagreement and parallel deliberation.
The strategy enters a familiar phase. Boards have focused on composition, but the next frontier is deliberation. Some boards already use “red team/blue team” exercises to stress-test assumptions. The article suggests briefly breaking into smaller groups to compare conclusions and surface concerns that might otherwise remain unspoken.
The announcement sounds familiar. Corporate boards operate under similar conditions to avalanche safety training, with consequential decisions made with incomplete information and compressed time frames. The question is whether the pressure to align silences the most important voices in the room.
Originally, the article was published on Fortune.com.
Author: Evan Null
