Source: Fox News
Summary
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Donald Trump’s administration in two immigration cases. In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the court held that migrants turned away at the border before entering the US are not entitled to apply for asylum. In Mullin v. Doe, the court ruled that Haitian and Syrian nationals with Temporary Protected Status (TPS) cannot receive judicial relief postponing the revocation of their status while challenging the Trump administration’s efforts to revoke it in court. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinions in both cases, arguing that migrants who are turned away at the border have not “arrived” in the US and that the TPS statute blocks recipients from legal relief unless their claims have a constitutional basis.
Our Reading
As expected, the matter has reached another stage.
The Supreme Court has weighed in on Trump’s immigration efforts, handing him two major victories. The justices have effectively narrowed the paths to asylum and limited the ability of certain migrants to challenge the revocation of their Temporary Protected Status. The decisions come as no surprise, given the Court’s previous stances on immigration. The Trump administration will likely use these rulings to further restrict asylum claims. The familiar dance between the administration and the courts continues.
One observation: The Court’s decisions have become a predictable part of the immigration debate, with each side using the rulings to further their own narrative.
Author: Evan Null
