Source: Fox News
Summary
National Museum of American History Director Anthea Hartig has been criticized for her comments on the role of history in social justice. In a resurfaced video, Hartig called history a “prime tool of social justice” and highlighted the museum’s efforts to become more inclusive and accessible. She also praised the Black Lives Matter movement and an anti-ICE organization called Tsuru for Solidarity. Hartig’s comments have sparked controversy, with some accusing the museum of promoting a biased agenda.
Our Reading
Once again, the discussion returns to a familiar question.
Hartig’s presentation to UCLA students was a performance of her museum’s commitment to social justice. She used a land acknowledgement and a photo of a defaced American flag to set the tone. Her talk was filled with buzzwords like “equity-based,” “justice-forward,” and “community-driven.” She praised the Black Lives Matter movement and an anti-ICE organization, highlighting their collaboration. The museum’s efforts to become more inclusive and accessible were presented as a bold new vision.
It’s clear that Hartig is playing a role, one that requires her to speak in a certain way and use certain language. The question is, what does this performance reveal about the museum’s true goals?
Author: Evan Null
